TBT Gear: Gossamer Gear Rukus

rukus_2
The Rukus pack. From Gossamer Gear.

A trend I’ve noticed with gear is that while the overall gear is light, the gear is getting to be overly complicated in my humble opinion. Especially as a company grows in size.

Snaps, buckles, extra doodads and so on to make closing a pack, getting gear outside of it or packing a little more complicated than it should be.

Part of the reason why I enjoy lightweight backpacking is the KISS principle.  If I am thinking less about my gear, I am enjoying being outside more.

Not that buckles and such are bad. But it seems they are getting more and more in the way of simple designs. My day pack of choice opens and closes quickly and is a simple and elegant design.  I love simplicity and functionality in my gear.

And much new gear does not reflect what I enjoy in the gear I use.

I’ve been reviewing a new garment for a magazine. This garment retails for $150 and is a mix of soft-shell like material and grid fleece. Lots of zippers and “technical features” yet it performs less well than my $10 fleece pullover.

In a similar vein, I won a pack recently at a raffle. I don’t need it, so I am probably donating the pack to charity. But it struck me how needlessly complicated it was just to open and close the darn pack versus my older gear.

The last pack I purchased (as opposed to be given for testing) was a ULA CDT .  The CDT  is “heavy” at 19 oz stripped down vs the 14 oz pack I was using for a while (pack review at bottom of link) But, you know what?  The slightly larger size, the durability, and (this is important) the SIMPLICITY of the ULA CDT pack makes it more conducive to my style and why I went back to it. The ULA CDT has become my default pack again starting in the fall of last year.  It fit my shoulder season gear easier and was just more of a natural fit for me overall. And it is now my day ski pack of choice, too.  I can fish gear easily in and out of the pack, the mesh pocket in front is a generous fit, the pack takes a beating and my overall base pack weight is still at or below 8 lbs depending on what I am doing. Well worth the “heavy” extra 5 extra ounces for more versatility and simplicity versus previously used packs.

Which brings up the Gossamer Gear Rukus.  A design Gossamer Gear is no longer producing I believe. What this means you can buy it pretty inexpensively on clearance for $40 as of April 2016.

Currently sold as a climbing pack, not sure it fills this role necessarily. Climbing gear, esp if a rope is hauled, is darn heavy. But it will work.

Truthfully, the Rukus does not fit any particularly outdoor role well.   The Gossamer Gear Type 2 Utility pack makes a better day pack. My ULA Catalyst is a wonderful workhorse pack.  And I’ve mentioned why I started using the ULA CDT again for most solo 3+ season backpacking. Which is why I don’t think the Rukus sold  well. What is the Rukus best used for????

What the Rukus ends up being is a fairly inexpensive “Jack of All Trades”  day pack.   It can be used for climbing if need be, it can be used for trail work or day hikes since it is reasonably durable and when traveling with bunk-house type accommodations,  I could not only shove in my quilt, heavier down coat , toiletries, etc, it was also small enough that it worked as carry-on luggage. It hauls groceries in town rather well and makes a suitable gym bag. And it is comfortable. As a bonus, the pack stores rather nicely because it does not take up much space when empty.

Which is how I use this pack: For a little of everything.

Part of the reason for this versatility is the somewhat odd, pear-like shape. Not the most efficient shape for trail use, but the shapes does make it  easy to fish things in and out of the Rukus. More so versus a pack that is more cylindrical in shape.  The draw string closure is easy to open and close. The front storage mesh pocket is very generous and durable. I can easily shove a tablet, perhaps a book, a ziplock bag full of toiletries when going through security and other items in this pocket. Very handy. Overall, the Rukus is a durable pack that can be used a lot  without getting wrecked.

The Rukus, at the end, is not quite suited for outdoor use overall versus other packs.  And people who just want a simple book-bag type pack for every day use will probably look elsewhere.

The Rukus is a niche item. A niche item most people probably don’t think about. And one, frankly, I would not use if I was not given this pack on a whim to use almost two years ago.

But the Rukus has become a favorite of mine. I don’t think of it as outdoor gear, but just an everyday item that works well.

I don’t know how much longer this pack will be available, but if you want a versatile Jack of All Trades  item for everyday use, the Rukus is a good addition.

At least it has been for me for almost the past two years.

EDIT Sept 2016: Looks like the Minimalist 24 is the successor to the Rukus

Note: I was given this pack almost two years ago with no expectation of a review.. I figure two years is a decent amount of time for a review… 

 

Share

3 thoughts on “TBT Gear: Gossamer Gear Rukus

  1. thank you for the review – I just bought this pack and a GG Minimalist on sale, so it is good to know yours has held up well. These will be carryon luggage and daypacks for a tour of Scotland later this year..

    The other light daypack I really like, is the Marmot Kompressor ultralight. We got two of these for use as daypacks on backpack hunting trips, they have worked really well – comfortable, light, and can haul a surprising amount of gear – emergency kit, raingear, warm gear, hunting knives, ropes and game bags, etc. The main reason I bought them was that they came in a hunting-orange colour, but would buy again in any colour..

    • The Marmot looks similar to the GG Type II. A nice design I find. The Rukus has really shined as carry-on luggage. I think it will work well for your Scotland trip!

  2. Kind of ironic that a multi-use general purpose daypack is a niche product…

    I’ve used a Rukus as a daily daypack for the past eight months and agree with you about the usefulness of the pack is due to its shape that allows the pack to expand to store a huge amount of gear, more than I expected. Certainly large enough for an UL overnight trip or for loading up as carry-on luggage.

    The only real negative I have with the Rukus is some of the minor design details and workmanship: the seams that go across the shoulder straps are coming undone, the drawstring eyelet is coming loose as it is not reinforced with an extra layer of fabric, the binding of the internal seams stopping just before the drawstring seems to catch on things when they are stuffed into the pack. The internal zip pocket could be a littler larger too.

    Hopefully a version 2 of the Rukus is released.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

Subscribe without commenting